All
MSU Instructors (and Senior Instructors) should have recently received a flyer
made just for instructors in your campus mail.
The flyer includes a welcome from the MSU Faculty Association to all instructors
to join the Association. We want to hear
your voice, especially your concerns about your job here at MSU. The flyer also contains the following
information about who we are and what we stand for here at MSU.
The MSU Faculty Association is concerned
with:
Contract
Issues
Contract issues are
central to MSUFA. Long-term contracts provide stability, loyalty, and improved
quality of instruction. Your MSUFA colleagues believe Instructors
deserve multi-year contracts, as described in the Faculty Handbook.
Salaries
and benefits
The gap between MSU salaries and those at peer institutions has
increased dramatically. Salaries and benefits are getting relatively worse at
Missouri State for all ranks. MSUFA acts as an independent advocate for fair
salaries and benefits, focusing on substantive, long term, and equitable
improvements in faculty compensation.
Our goal is to work with the University to reach a collective bargaining
agreement. The administration has not raised faculty salaries relative to peer institutions
(see salary chart below).
Shared
governance
MSUFA members believe that shared faculty governance allows the
university to benefit from faculty members’ qualifications and experiences as
educators. As the members of the
university community who work most closely with students, faculty bring a
unique perspective to the conduct of university affairs.
Excellence
in education
MSUFA members believe that public education is a
civic virtue, benefitting both students and the community.
Why should you care?
Shared
governance is a goal yet to be achieved at Missouri State
While the MSU faculty members are bound by the Faculty Handbook,
the administration is not. The Board of
Governors includes a student member, but no faculty representation.
Excellence
in education is in jeopardy at Missouri State
In many
areas, the quality of student education is declining. Over the last two decades MSU has
dramatically increased class sizes, the use of part-time faculty, and hiring at
levels that do not require a terminal degree.
Support for instructional programs has stagnated while the size of
administration has grown and non-program spending increased.
Instructor
salaries have lagged dramatically behind salaries at MSU’s benchmark
institutions. MSU identifies 11
benchmark institutions in its current long-range plan. The following data
compares MSU faculty by rank to these benchmark institutions. As noted on the President’s web page: “This
set of institutions is similar to Missouri State University-Springfield in many
respects (e.g., student headcount, level and span of degree programs), but
possesses characteristics and accomplishes outcomes that we aspire to
achieve.” How much are you underpaid
over the past 14 years relative to pay at these benchmark institutions? Here is the data for Instructors:
In the last year listed AY 11-12, the
difference in salaries is $6,679. Don’t
forget, as the University has been quick to tell us over the years, that the
value of our benefits must be included to fully calculate faculty total
compensation:
Notice
that we see the same pattern here as with salaries. The value of benefits at MSU is similar to
our benchmark institutions in AY 98-99, with an ever increasing disparity over
time. In the last AY, which for benefits
is AY 10-11, the difference in benefits equals $4,688.
How
much in $$ have YOU lost?
In
current dollars, the lost salary from an MSU Instructor not being paid
her/his worth (i.e., the average for MSU benchmark universities) over
the last 14 years equals:
$89,817
(salary) + $41,717 (benefits) = $131,534
What
YOU can do to change being UNDERPAID?
Join MSU Faculty Association and fight
to correct these inequities.
The data
suggests that there are two main causes of the low faculty salaries at
MSU. First, over this time period the
MSU administration has chosen to invest available budget dollars into other,
non-academic, areas of the university including administration and professional
(non-academic) staff. In fact, while the
numbers of ranked faculty have remained constant at MSU since 1993, even as
student enrollment has increased, the number of administrators has increased by
31 percent and the numbers of non-academic professional staff have increased by
273 percent. As a percentage of total
FTE employees on campus faculty, both ranked and unranked, have fallen from
45.6% of all FTE in 1993 to 35.9 percent in 2010. See the Faculty Senate staffing report in
2010 for a full picture of what has happened in these areas over time (linked
to the right).
If you are
interested in these issues and others related to your employment at MSU please
join us this Thursday, December 5, for discussion and a social at Dublin’s
Pass, 317 E. Park Central, 5:30 to 7:30 pm – food and beverage provided. For more information contact MSU Faculty
Association at MSUfaculty1@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment